Job Agreed, but it's a slap in the face for users who actually use these features which are, judging by the amount of replies in this topic regarding the removal of the features - quite a bit.
It's once again the removal of features that are not communicated unless users ask where something is after an update only to find out it has been removed. After all this time I would've expected bunq had improved their communication skills.
For bunq: I remember reading somewhere that app statistics are used to decide if a feature is used a lot or not. Makes perfect sense but do you also keep in mind that these settings (the ones that have been removed) are settings a user sets once in a very long time, thus resulting in low "usage"?
John Do Exactly that. I know the sentiment is on the bad side at the moment (including mine), it's good you mention the positive things. Which they definitely are, and hats off for bunq on those!