@David-Brown-Kiwi#285424
Je préfère le premier, avec les icons

Hey all 👋
Let's make sure to share our thoughts regarding the recent changes @David-Brown-Kiwi#285424 posted about the payment details displayed in the app. Your feedback is crucial in helping our product team better understand your needs and preferences, ultimately allowing us to enhance your banking experience. The more input we receive, the more we can tailor our services to meet the expectations of our users! 🌈

@David-Brown-Kiwi#285559

We could make it -1,500 to show that the Sorted amount was sorted out of the sub-account.

I think that at least communicates with existing concepts (the minus) that money is going away.
But then you run into the order problem: first 2700 got in, then -1500 was sorted. Since this view shows the most recent transaction at the top:

One could place the -1500 above the [+]2700 to follow the reverse chronological order better.

So currently the design uses a "sub-line" UNDER the main transaction.
One could see if it visually acceptable to place it above it in different ways:

You could try sub-line above the 2700, as well as a normal transaction line above the 2700, but with a visual indicator that they belong together.
(Like a vertical line or a grouping or perhaps even a indentation, though honestly it could just be a normal transaction line with a minus number and the auto-sort icon. It doesn't have to follow the idea of Auto Save.)

And as mentioned, if the transaction was sorted to more than 1 goal, it could be expanded into many transaction rows showing all the auto-sorted amounts with minuses of course.

If collapsed, you could show the total of an auto-sorted number, but that can be a calculated number, not a number that would shows up in the transaction log and displaying that is not without risk. (Separate point.)

@David-Brown-Kiwi#285559 about the 1500 and a calculated number:

In your first screenshot, let's say you have added the - (minus) issue and you addressed the order challenge. - The "1500" might be a calculated number or a virtual number.

Showing a virtual number might confuse people if they don't expect it because the context, like this transaction overview where this is, creates the expectation that if it displays "-1500" that on the receivers end it displays +1500.

However, as we just established, the sorted 1500 can be a calculated number, meaning 1000 euro could be sorted to sub-account B and 500 to C. (1500 = 1000 + 500)

One cannot see/know that by reading "🔀 -1500".

So what do we need? We need a hint this number is different [or not show calculated numbers here].

One can do:
"🔀 x2: -1500"
or
Actually displaying quotes around the number:
'🔀 x2 "-1500" '
However this is not a universal language.
"Auto-Sorted (2) - Total: 🔀 -1500"
This one gets closer. I am trying to communicate unambiguously what is going on.

So the question is how does one communicate that this number is "not real/literal" and is the total of all auto-sorted payments and not a literal transaction?

(This is also why the form factor of Auto Save and Auto Sort should not be the same. As you explained the -0,50 is TRULY a transaction that can be found on the transaction log. The -1500 might not be. )

I prefer the first one. Though I like clean design, I also like a good UX. I don’t want to perform an extra click each time when I want to see important info like that.

I like info, the more details, stats, info, etc. I can see the better - as long as it’s not annoyingly busy or it’s showing details I couldn’t care less about. I would say stuff like an IBAN is very important if you actively click on that account, so keep it there.

It could be good to also make it optional in settings, so people who wants more info can turn it on.